Was red meat found not-guilty?


On 28th November 2016, this article, “In Defence of Red Meat”, suggested that you should: “Ask for a meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials studying red meat consumption (let alone grass fed) – there isn’t one.” Then, in the December 2016 issue of the American Journal of Clinical Nutrition, this appeared: “Total red meat intake of ≥0.5 servings/d does not negatively influence cardiovascular disease risk factors: a systemically searched meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials”.

Does this mean that we now have a meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials for red meat and human health? The answer is still no and I’ll explain why...


The rest of this article is available to Club Members, who get access to all our articles, videos, recipes and newsletters.
To continue reading, please LOGIN or sign up for a membership. Thank you.

Sign up here for membership access...


Single Sign On provided by vBSSO