The Lancet study, which was published on January 10th 2019, was presented as such a definitive nail in the coffin of low carb diets that it deserves a complete rebuttal. Last week we noted that prospective cohort studies and meta-analyses of these studies have compared people who consume whole grain carbs with people who consume refined carbs. These population studies have not compared whole grain consumers with real food/low-carb consumers, not least because the latter way of eating is a recent phenomenon and the population studies that we rely on today date back to 1968.
One of the claims, which requires a full rebuttal, is the assertion that a low carb diet is a low fiber diet. A zero carb diet is a zero fiber diet, but there are so few people eating zero carb, that this will probably never be possible to assess in any population study.
The Guardian headline – “Blow to low carb diet as landmark study finds high fibre cuts heart disease risk” (Ref 1) – has been very interesting to examine more thoroughly:
Is a low carb diet a low fiber diet?
Back to the diagram from last week:
Box A contains food groups high in fiber and low in carbohydrate.
Box B contains food groups high in fiber and high in carbohydrate.
Box C contains food groups low in fiber and low in carbohydrate (with the exception of some carbohydrate in dairy, these foods are essentially zero fiber and zero carbohydrate).
Box D contains food groups low in fiber and high in carbohydrate. Box D also contains foods that don’t fit into natural food groups, because they aren’t natural foods – all junk is in Box D.
The rest of this article is available to Club Members, who get access to all our articles, videos, recipes and newsletters.
To continue reading, please LOGIN or sign up for a membership. Thank you.